Initial management of intraabdominal abscesses and preventive strategies for abscess recurrence in penetrating Crohn's disease: a national multicenter study based on ENEIDA registry.

INTRODUCTION: Intra-abdominal abscesses complicating Crohn's disease (CD) are a challenging situation. Their management, during the hospitalization and after resolution, is still unclear. METHODS: Adult patients with CD complicated with intraabdominal abscess who required hospitalization were included from the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry from GETECCU. Initial strategy effectiveness and safety to resolve abscess was assessed. Survival analysis was performed to evaluate recurrence risk. Predictive factors associated with resolution were evaluated by multivariate regression and predictive factors associated with recurrence were assessed by Cox regression. RESULTS: 520 patients from 37 Spanish hospitals were included; 322 (63%) were initially treated with antibiotics alone, 128 (26%) with percutaneous drainage, and 54 (17%) with surgical drainage. The size of the abscess was critical to the effectiveness of each treatment. In abscesses < 30mm, the antibiotic was as effective as percutaneous or surgical drainage. However, in larger abscesses, percutaneous or surgical drainage was superior. In abscesses > 50mm, surgery was superior to percutaneous drainage, although it was associated with a higher complication rate. After abscess resolution, luminal resection was associated with a lower 1-year abscess recurrence risk (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.76). However, those patients who initiated anti-TNF therapy had a similar recurrence risk whether luminal resection had been performed. CONCLUSIONS: Small abscesses (<30mm) can be managed with antibiotics alone, while larger ones require drainage. Percutaneous drainage will be effective and safer than surgery in many cases. After discharge, anti-TNF therapy reduces abscess recurrence risk in a similar way to bowel resection.

Prevalence of missed lesions in patients with inadequate bowel preparation through a very early repeat colonoscopy.

OBJECTIVES: When bowel preparation (BP) is inadequate, international guidelines recommend repeating the colonoscopy within 1 year to avoid missing clinically relevant lesions. We aimed to determine the rate of missed lesions in patients with inadequate BP through a very early repeat colonoscopy with adequate BP. METHODS: Post hoc analysis was conducted using data collected from a prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial including patients with inadequate BP and then repeat colonoscopy. Inadequate BP was defined as the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score <2 points in any segment. We included patients with any indication for colonoscopy. The adenoma detection rate (ADR), advanced ADR (AADR), and serrated polyp detection rate (SPDR) were calculated for index and repeat colonoscopies. RESULTS: Of the 651 patients with inadequate BP from the original trial, 413 (63.4%) achieved adequate BP on repeat colonoscopy. The median interval between index and repeat colonoscopies was 28 days. On repeat colonoscopy, the ADR was 45.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 40.5-50.1%), the AADR was 10.9% (95% CI 8.1-14.3%), and the SPDR was 14.3% (95% CI 10.9-17.7%). Cancer was discovered in four patients (1%; 95% CI 0.2-2.5%). A total of 60.2% of all advanced adenoma (AA) were discovered on repeat colonoscopy. A colon segment scored BBPS = 0 had most AA (66.1%) and all four cancers. CONCLUSION: Patients with inadequate BP present a high rate of AAs on repeat colonoscopy. When a colonoscopy has a colon segment score BBPS = 0, we recommend repeating the colonoscopy as soon as possible.

Effectiveness and predictors of response to somatostatin analogues in patients with gastrointestinal angiodysplasias: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal angiodysplasias are vascular malformations that often cause red blood cell transfusion-dependent anaemia. Several studies suggest that somatostatin analogues might decrease rebleeding rates, but the true effect size is unknown. We therefore aimed to investigate the efficacy of somatostatin analogues on red blood cell transfusion requirements of patients with gastrointestinal angiodysplasias and to identify subgroups that might benefit the most from somatostatin analogue therapy. METHODS: We did a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane on Jan 15, 2016, with an updated search on April 25, 2021. All published randomised controlled trials and cohort studies that reported on somatostatin analogue therapy in patients with gastrointestinal angiodysplasias were eligible for screening. We excluded studies without original patient data, single case reports, small case series (ie, <10 participants), studies in which patients had a specific aetiology of gastrointestinal angiodysplasias, and studies in which somatostatin analogue therapy was initiated simultaneously with other treatment modalities. Authors of eligible studies were invited to share individual patient data. Aggregated data was used if individual patient data were not provided. The primary outcome was the mean reduction in the number of red blood cell transfusions during somatostatin analogue therapy, compared with baseline, expressed as the incidence rate ratio (IRR) and absolute mean decrease. We defined patients as either good responders (≥50% reduction in the number of red blood cell transfusions) or poor responders (<50% reduction). A mixed-effects negative binomial regression was used to account for clustering of patients and skewness in data. This study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), number CRD42020213985. FINDINGS: We identified 11 eligible studies (one randomised controlled trial and ten cohort studies) of moderate-to-high quality and obtained individual patient data from the authors of nine (82%) studies. The remaining two (18%) studies provided sufficient information in the published manuscript to extract individual patient data. In total, we analysed data from 212 patients. Somatostatin analogues reduced the number of red blood cell transfusions with an IRR of 0·18 (95% CI 0·14-0·24; p<0·0001) during a median treatment duration of 12 months (IQR 6·0-12·0) and follow-up period of 12 months (12·0-12·0), correlating with a mean absolute decrease in the number of red blood cell transfusions from 12·8 (95% CI 10·4-15·8) during baseline to 2·3 (1·9-2·9) during follow-up-ie, a reduction of 10·5 red blood cell transfusions (p<0·0001). 177 (83%) of 212 patients had a good response to somatostatin analogue therapy (defined as at least a 50% reduction in the number of red blood cell transfusions). Heterogeneity across studies was moderate (I2=53%; p=0·02). Location of gastrointestinal angiodysplasias in the stomach compared with angiodysplasias in the small bowel and colon (IRR interaction 1·92 [95% CI 1·13-3·26]; p=0·02) was associated with worse treatment response. Octreotide was associated with a better treatment response than lanreotide therapy (IRR interaction 2·13 [95% CI 1·12-4·04]; p=0·02). The certainty of evidence was high for the randomised controlled trial and low for the ten cohort studies. Adverse events occurred in 38 (18%) of 212 patients receiving somatostatin analogue therapy, with ten (5%) discontinuing this therapy because of adverse events. The most common adverse events were loose stools (seven [3%] of 212), cholelithiasis (five [2%]), flatulence (four [2%]), and administration site reactions (erythema, five [2%]). INTERPRETATION: Somatostatin analogue therapy is safe and effective in most patients with red blood cell transfusion-dependent bleeding due to gastrointestinal angiodysplasias. Somatostatin analogue therapy is more effective in patients with angiodysplasias located in the small bowel and colon, and octreotide therapy seems to be more effective than lanreotide therapy. FUNDING: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development and the Radboud University Medical Center.

Prospective comparative study between two first-line regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication: Non-bismuth quadruple versus bismuth quadruple therapy / Estudio comparativo prospectivo entre 2 tratamientos de primera línea para la erradicación de Helicobacter pylori: tetraterapia sin bismuto frente a tetraterapia con bismuto

BACKGROUND: The Maastricht V Consensus recommends quadruple therapies as first-line Helicobacter pylori treatment in high clarithromycin (CLA) resistance areas. AIMS: To compare efficacy, side effects and compliance between quadruple concomitant non-bismuth vs bismuth quadruple therapy. METHOD: Prospective study enrolling H. pylori-positive patients. Omeprazol and a three-in-one formulation of bismuth-metronidazol-tetracycline (OBMT-3/1) for 10 days, or combination of omeprazol-clarithromycin-amoxicillin-metronidazol (OCAM) for 14 days, were prescribed. Eradication outcome was assessed by urea breath test or histology. Side effects and compliance were recorded during the treatment period with specific questionnaires. RESULTS: 404 patients were recruited (median age 53 years; 62.87% women). In 382 (183 with OCAM, 199 with OBMT-3/1) the post-treatment test result was available. The eradication rates were 85.94% (CI95%: 80.20-90.52) with OCAM and 88.21% (CI95%: 83.09-92.22) with OBMT-3/1 (p = 0.595) in intention-to-treat analysis, whilst in per protocol analysis they were 91.12% (CI95%: 85.78-94.95) and 96.17% (CI95%: 92.28-98.45) respectively (p = 0.083). Compliance over 90% was 91.35% with OCAM and 92.04% with OBMT-3/1 (p = 0.951). Some side effect was present in 94.02% with OCAM and in 88.89% with OBMT-3/1 (p = 0.109), being longer (12 vs 7 days, p < 0.0001) and more severe (p < 0.0001) with OCAM. CONCLUSIONS: In a high CLA-resistance area, there are no differences between OBMT-3/1 and OCAM in H. pylori eradication and compliance rates, but OBMT-3/1 achieves a higher safety profile

ANTECEDENTES: El Consenso de Maastricht V recomienda tetraterapias como tratamiento de primera línea de Helicobacter pylori en áreas con elevada resistencia a claritromicina (CLA). OBJETIVOS: Comparar la eficacia, los efectos secundarios y el cumplimiento terapéutico entre la tetraterapia sin bismuto y la tetraterapia con bismuto. MÉTODO: Estudio prospectivo que incluyó a pacientes con H. pylori. Se prescribió omeprazol y una formulación 3 en uno de bismuto-metronidazol-tetraciclina (OBMT-3/1) durante 10 días, o una combinación de omeprazol-claritromicina-amoxicilina-metronidazol (OCAM) durante 14 días. El resultado de la erradicación se evaluó mediante una prueba de aliento con urea o histología. Los efectos secundarios y el cumplimiento terapéutico se registraron durante el período de tratamiento empleando cuestionarios específicos. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 404 pacientes (mediana de edad de 53 años; un 62,87% de mujeres). El resultado de la prueba posterior al tratamiento estuvo disponible en 382 pacientes (183 con OCAM, 199 con OBMT-3/1). Las tasas de erradicación fueron del 85,94% (IC 95%: 80,20-90,52) con OCAM y del 88,21% (IC 95%: 83,09-92,22) con OBMT-3/1 (p = 0,595) en el análisis por intención de tratar, mientras que en el análisis por protocolo fueron del 91,12% (IC 95%: 85,78-94,95) y del 96,17% (IC 95%: 92,28-98,45), respectivamente (p = 0,083). El cumplimiento terapéutico superior al 90% fue del 91,35% con OCAM y del 92,04% con OBMT-3/1 (p = 0,951). Se observaron efectos secundarios en el 94,02% de los pacientes tratados con OCAM y en el 88,89% de los tratados con OBMT-3/1 (p = 0,109), y fueron más prolongados (12 frente a 7 días, p < 0,0001) y más graves (p < 0,0001) con OCAM. CONCLUSIONES: En un área con elevada resistencia a la CLA no se observan diferencias entre OBMT-3/1 y OCAM en la erradicación de H. pylori ni en las tasas de cumplimiento, pero OBMT-3/1 presenta un perfil de seguridad superior

Prospective comparative study between two first-line regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication: Non-bismuth quadruple versus bismuth quadruple therapy.

BACKGROUND: The Maastricht V Consensus recommends quadruple therapies as first-line Helicobacter pylori treatment in high clarithromycin (CLA) resistance areas. AIMS: To compare efficacy, side effects and compliance between quadruple concomitant non-bismuth vs bismuth quadruple therapy. METHOD: Prospective study enrolling H. pylori-positive patients. Omeprazol and a three-in-one formulation of bismuth-metronidazol-tetracycline (OBMT-3/1) for 10 days, or combination of omeprazol-clarithromycin-amoxicillin-metronidazol (OCAM) for 14 days, were prescribed. Eradication outcome was assessed by urea breath test or histology. Side effects and compliance were recorded during the treatment period with specific questionnaires. RESULTS: 404 patients were recruited (median age 53 years; 62.87% women). In 382 (183 with OCAM, 199 with OBMT-3/1) the post-treatment test result was available. The eradication rates were 85.94% (CI95%: 80.20-90.52) with OCAM and 88.21% (CI95%: 83.09-92.22) with OBMT-3/1 (p=0.595) in intention-to-treat analysis, whilst in per protocol analysis they were 91.12% (CI95%: 85.78-94.95) and 96.17% (CI95%: 92.28-98.45) respectively (p=0.083). Compliance over 90% was 91.35% with OCAM and 92.04% with OBMT-3/1 (p=0.951). Some side effect was present in 94.02% with OCAM and in 88.89% with OBMT-3/1 (p=0.109), being longer (12 vs 7 days, p<0.0001) and more severe (p<0.0001) with OCAM. CONCLUSIONS: In a high CLA-resistance area, there are no differences between OBMT-3/1 and OCAM in H. pylori eradication and compliance rates, but OBMT-3/1 achieves a higher safety profile.

Long-term results with lanreotide in patients with recurrent gastrointestinal angiodysplasias bleeding or obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Benefits in efficacy and procedures consumption.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal angiodysplasias (GIAD) bleeding and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) are increasing health problems. Somatostatin analogues have been proposed as rescue therapy, but data for lanreotide are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy, safety and resource saving of long-acting lanreotide for GIAD and OGIB. METHODS: Retrospective study including adults with GIAD bleeding or OGIB and lanreotide treatment for at least 6 consecutive months. Demographics, comorbidities and treatments were collected. Anaemia and health resource consumption were analysed and compared between the year before and three years after starting lanreotide. Complete response was defined as a lack of new blood transfusion or endovenous iron dose need. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (mean age 76.8 years) were included, 63% taking anticoagulants/antiplatelets. The bleeding was attributable to angiodysplasia in 85.2%, of whom half had multi-site lesions. Lanreotide was administered for a median of 27.1 months. During follow-up of up to 3 years (mean 32.5 months), 18.5% of patients achieved complete response and around 60% a 50% reduction of health resource consumption. Haemoglobin values improved (p = .007), while admission time, blood/iron infusions, and the number of endoscopies decreased significantly (p<.05) at least up to the second year. There were no relevant side effects during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with lanreotide significantly improves anaemia and decreases health resource consumption in patients with recurrent GIAD bleeding or OGIB.